Quantcast
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 41826

Why does Blast report a different alignment when using the -m8 option

i really need to know why when i do a blast with the option -m8, i have different results (different % identities, and gaps). example..normal >tr|Q3T560|Q3T560_9GAMM Arsenite transporter ATPase-like protein OS=Acidithiobacillus caldus               GN=arsA1 PE=4 SV=1           Length = 612 Score =  612 bits (1577), Expect = 0.0,   Method: Compositional matrix adjust.  Identities = 329/546 (60%), Positives = 400/546 (73%), Gaps = 5/546 (0%)Query: 372511 RVLLVSTDPASNVGQVFGTDIGNHITQIGQVSGLEALEIDPEAAAEDYRERIIGPIRSTL 372570               ++LLVSTDPASNVGQVF  +IGN IT I  V+GL ALEIDP+ AA+ YRERI+GP+R  L Sbjct: 38     KILLVSTDPASNVGQVFSQEIGNKITTISTVAGLSALEIDPQQAAQQYRERIVGPVRGAL 97Query: 372571 PEKALNSIKEQLSGACTTEIAAFDEFTALLTDPELIERYDHIVFDTAPTGHTIRLLKLPG 372630   with -m8 option   # BLASTP 2.2.25 [Feb-01-2011] # Query: # Database: /home/biolinux/Desktop/fasta/ars/arsenic_db_3.fasta # Fields: Query id, Subject id, % identity, alignment length, mismatches, gap openings, q. start, q. end, s. start, s. end, e-value, bit score 1_0    tr|Q3T560|Q3T560_9GAMM    63.55    546    194    4    372511    373052    38    582    0.0     612   normal i have 60% of identities and 5 gaps, when i put -m8 option i have 63.55% identities and 4 gaps.. any reason?? ...

Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 41826

Trending Articles